In (33%) of the second tumor was not bronchogenic carcinoma cells (colon, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and breast cancer). There were no other malignancies in the number of malignant mesotheliomas study. Five people had pathological evidence of asbestosis (four lung cancer, colorectal adenocarcinoma). Two people is not bronchogenic carcinomas asbestos bodies were identifiable but not interstitial fibrosis. In both cases it was the second type of cancer (squamous cell and small cell carcinoma primary bronchogenic) with diffuse interstitial fibrosis, but no asbestos bodies under light microscopy were observed. In all cases microscopic transmission electron analysis showed asbestos fiber minerals load within a range of background themes population control and well below that observed in cases asbestosis base.
Cases were considered cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis for represented in individuals with a history of asbestos exposure. Syn chronous mesothelioma with malignant carcinomas in workers exposed to asbestos rareand identified in 1.8% of the 500 series mesothelioma attorney evil. In most cases, cancer is aprimary bronchogenic carcinoma. Primary pulmonary carcin-Omas whenoccurring recognized as asbestos related only in combination with asbestosis. I mix in seriesthis appeared (and bronchogenic carcinoma ASBEs-Tose) in four (0.8%) cases. In post-mortemcases with malignant mesothelioma settlements is import-ant possible to identify any other cancer and determinewhether associated with asbestos. His presence impactupon life expectancy and hope of mesothelioma affect ofmalignant compensationsettlement presence.
Malignant mesothelioma cases are not suspected after death is extremely important to establish definitive diagnosis reasons.1First threemain, secondly, to identify the likely etiology; and concomitant pathology thirdly, no air todocument. In the medical-legal claims related to asbestos, accurate documentation. Many people diagnosed with mesothelioma lawyers where asbestos is known to cause disease helps filed compensation claims for asbestos settlement trust or by the judicial system. A person with mesothelioma claims have been exposed to asbestos usually set more than one year and more than a product of asbestos. The risk is shared with mesothelioma among constant factors problem faced by professionals plaque disease compensation, jurors, those responsible for the payment of damages and now the US Senate in its efforts to put together a bill establishing a trust asbestos settlement. In this article, we address the following question: guy I was with mesothelioma settlement where it is known that asbestos to cause helps offset their illness, how should the compensation be distributed among the responsible for asbestos exposure.